Mahaan, Episode 101
December 24, 2010
Friday, December 24, 2010
Thursday, December 23, 2010
Christmas Special Programs 2010
9.00 AM
Special episode of Univercell Koffee with Anu Season 3 with renowned singer K.J. Yesudas. Most popular music Director Harris Jeyaraj will join Anu Haasan for a cool chat and would share some of the interesting experiences of music.
10.00 AM
Audio release function of the upcoming film ‘Siruthai’ will be showcased. Actor Karthi along with Tammanah apart from popular faces of Tamil filmdom are to feature on the show.
11.00 AM
Hollywood blockbuster comedy film ‘Flubber’, starring Robin Williams, Marcia Gay Harden, directed by Les mayfield will be telecast.
2.00 PM
‘Kavalan’ a sneak peek into the much awaited Vijay starrer. This Siddique directed venture stars Vijay, Asin, Rajkiran, Roja, Vadivelu with music compsed by Vidyasagar.
2.30 PM
‘Manmadhan Ambu’, a preview of the rom-com movie directed by K.S. Ravikumar featuring Ulaganayagan Kamal Hasan, Trisha, Madhavan, Sangeeta, music Director Devi Sri Prasad would be telecast.
3.00 PM
A warm comical Tamil feature film titled ‘Enna Mayam Seithayo’ starring actors Jayaram, Gopika, directed by Akku Akbar will be aired.
5.30 PM
Aachi sing the Season 2010’; the annual carol singing competition would betelecast .
8.00 PM
‘Amman Try Oru Varthai Oru Latcham’ will bring in guests from television industry to participate in the show hosted by music Director James Vasanthan.
9.00 PM
‘Poorvika Mobile Junior Super Stars powered by India Gate Basmati rice’ will bring in the eminent singer S. Janaki to celebrate the festival with the kids on the show.
10.00 PM
‘Kadhal Meter’ a show that makes a reality check of the compatibility quotient of celebrity couples from the television world hosted by actor Suresh will be aired.
Stay tuned to watch all the Christmas specials on 25th December 2010 only on Vijay TV.
Monday, December 20, 2010
Controversial Song in Manmadhan Ambu deleted
Kamal Haasan in a matter to his fans settled which he has deleted a strain which had harm a sentiments of Hindus. In a matter Kamal Haasan has mentioned:
”Greetings to all my dear honeyed fans,
I have come to know which a strain which you have created for Manmadhan Ambu has harm a feelings of a Hindus. The Censor Board who has censored this movie has additionally available this strain given this does not have any lines which would harm a feelings of anyone. This strain was additionally radio programme in Vijay TV 3 times as well as had a great reception. you would have expelled this movie with a strain with a Censor Board acceptance if a movie was constructed by me. This is Red Giant Movies film. Since this movie is being constructed by Udhayanidhi Stalin as well as should be noticed by members of all religions, you had come brazen to undo this strain yet thousands of people have enjoyed this song.
In my family there have been Vaishnavites, Saivites, Muslims as well as Christians. Most of them have been believers. They have been not similar to me. you am a rationalist as well as atheist. It is similar to which as well as it will go on to be so.
Manmadhan Ambu is a business. That additionally it is an additional person’s business. you am usually an artist. you am not brand new to domestic obstacles. This movie was done with a goal to entertain. So you have done this preference to scapegoat this strain for it should not die in this turmoil of sacrament as well as politics.
Content - Cinemapakkam
”Greetings to all my dear honeyed fans,
I have come to know which a strain which you have created for Manmadhan Ambu has harm a feelings of a Hindus. The Censor Board who has censored this movie has additionally available this strain given this does not have any lines which would harm a feelings of anyone. This strain was additionally radio programme in Vijay TV 3 times as well as had a great reception. you would have expelled this movie with a strain with a Censor Board acceptance if a movie was constructed by me. This is Red Giant Movies film. Since this movie is being constructed by Udhayanidhi Stalin as well as should be noticed by members of all religions, you had come brazen to undo this strain yet thousands of people have enjoyed this song.
In my family there have been Vaishnavites, Saivites, Muslims as well as Christians. Most of them have been believers. They have been not similar to me. you am a rationalist as well as atheist. It is similar to which as well as it will go on to be so.
Manmadhan Ambu is a business. That additionally it is an additional person’s business. you am usually an artist. you am not brand new to domestic obstacles. This movie was done with a goal to entertain. So you have done this preference to scapegoat this strain for it should not die in this turmoil of sacrament as well as politics.
Content - Cinemapakkam
என்ன.. யுவனும் நடிக்கப் போய்விட்டாரா என்று பயப்பட வேண்டாம்... இது யுவனின் இசைக் கச்சேரிக்கான ஒரு இசை ஆல்பம். வரும் ஜனவரியில் சென்னையில் பிரமாண்ட இசைக் கச்சேரி நடத்துகிறார் யுவன். உள்ளூரில் அவர் நடத்தும் முதல் இசை நிகழ்ச்சி இது. இந்த நிகழ்ச்சிக்கான முன்னோட்டமாக ஒரு அட்டகாசமான மியூசிக் வீடியோ தயாரிக்கத் திட்டமிட்டுள்ளனர். இதில் நடிக்கப் போகிறவர் யுவன்சங்கர் ராஜாதான். விஷ்ணுவர்தன் இயக்க, நீரவ் ஷா ஒளிப்பதிவு செய்கிறார். விஜய்டிவி இந்த நிகழ்ச்சியை ஏற்பாடு செய்துள்ளது. சமீபத்தில் ஏ ஆர் ரஹ்மான் வெளிநாடுகளில் இசைக்கச்சேரி நடத்தினார். இந்த நிகழ்ச்சிகளின்போது பாடல்களுக்கு அவர் நவீன உடைகளில் தோன்றி ஆடவும் செய்தார். இப்போது தமிழின் நம்பர் ஒன் இசையமைப்பாளரான யுவனும் பாடி ஆடப் போகிறார்.
என்ன.. யுவனும் நடிக்கப் போய்விட்டாரா என்று பயப்பட வேண்டாம்... இது யுவனின் இசைக் கச்சேரிக்கான ஒரு இசை ஆல்பம்.
வரும் ஜனவரியில் சென்னையில் பிரமாண்ட இசைக் கச்சேரி நடத்துகிறார் யுவன். உள்ளூரில் அவர் நடத்தும் முதல் இசை நிகழ்ச்சி இது. இந்த நிகழ்ச்சிக்கான முன்னோட்டமாக ஒரு அட்டகாசமான மியூசிக் வீடியோ தயாரிக்கத் திட்டமிட்டுள்ளனர்.
இதில் நடிக்கப் போகிறவர் யுவன்சங்கர் ராஜாதான். விஷ்ணுவர்தன் இயக்க, நீரவ் ஷா ஒளிப்பதிவு செய்கிறார்.
விஜய்டிவி இந்த நிகழ்ச்சியை ஏற்பாடு செய்துள்ளது.
சமீபத்தில் ஏ ஆர் ரஹ்மான் வெளிநாடுகளில் இசைக்கச்சேரி நடத்தினார். இந்த நிகழ்ச்சிகளின்போது பாடல்களுக்கு அவர் நவீன உடைகளில் தோன்றி ஆடவும் செய்தார். இப்போது தமிழின் நம்பர் ஒன் இசையமைப்பாளரான யுவனும் பாடி ஆடப் போகிறார்.
வரும் ஜனவரியில் சென்னையில் பிரமாண்ட இசைக் கச்சேரி நடத்துகிறார் யுவன். உள்ளூரில் அவர் நடத்தும் முதல் இசை நிகழ்ச்சி இது. இந்த நிகழ்ச்சிக்கான முன்னோட்டமாக ஒரு அட்டகாசமான மியூசிக் வீடியோ தயாரிக்கத் திட்டமிட்டுள்ளனர்.
இதில் நடிக்கப் போகிறவர் யுவன்சங்கர் ராஜாதான். விஷ்ணுவர்தன் இயக்க, நீரவ் ஷா ஒளிப்பதிவு செய்கிறார்.
விஜய்டிவி இந்த நிகழ்ச்சியை ஏற்பாடு செய்துள்ளது.
சமீபத்தில் ஏ ஆர் ரஹ்மான் வெளிநாடுகளில் இசைக்கச்சேரி நடத்தினார். இந்த நிகழ்ச்சிகளின்போது பாடல்களுக்கு அவர் நவீன உடைகளில் தோன்றி ஆடவும் செய்தார். இப்போது தமிழின் நம்பர் ஒன் இசையமைப்பாளரான யுவனும் பாடி ஆடப் போகிறார்.
Trai to review tariff order
The Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (Tdsat) has asked the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) to study again in-depth the entire scenario relating to tariff for addressable and non addressable systems. This is in response to Trai's order that "the a-la-carte rate for a pay channel for addressable systems shall not be more than 35 per cent of the a-la-carte rate of the channel as specified by the broadcaster for non-addressable systems".
This rate had been fixed in the proviso to Clause Four of the Telecommunication (Broadcasting & Cable) Services (Fourth) (Addressable System Order) 2010 issued on 21 July which came into effect from 1 September this year. Earlier, broadcasters charged from DTH and IPTV players 50 per cent of what they got from cable operators. Tdsat chairperson SB Sinha and members GD Gaiha and PK Rastogi in their order said Trai should start the process of tariff fixation upon taking the relevant factors into consideration afresh and should for the purpose of laying down tariffs undertake a detailed study of the same. The order came on appeals by ESPN, Zee Turner, Star Den, MSM Discovery, Sun TV Network, Viacom18, Ushodaya Enterprises of Hyderabad, and Neo Sports against the Trai Tariff Order. Some of the DTH operators with DTH Operators Association of India as also other MSOs have been impleaded as parties, as also the Tamil Nadu Progressive Consumer Centre.
On 23 August, broadcasters had moved Tdsat challenging Trai's tariff order to cap wholesale price of channels to service providers like DTH and IPTV. The broadcasters had submitted that while fixing the tariff, Trai had acted in an arbitrary and unreasonable manner and did not consider the suggestions of the stakeholders. At the outset, the Tdsat bench admitted it had not been able to deliver judgement for several reasons. "One of these being long arguments and a clarification sought for subsequently by us with regard to inter alia, the applicability of Section 11(1)(b)(iv) vis-a-vis Section 11(2) of the Trai Act and also due to non-filing of Written Statements by some of the counsel in time," it said.
Noting that it had been accepted by every stakeholder that almost all the problems would be solved if "addressability' is achieved, the tribunal said it failed to 'understand why the Government has not taken adequate measure in this behalf. Even in the capital town of Delhi, it has not been fully achieved." The Tribunal expressed the hope that the target fixed by Trai will receive adequate attention of the Government and it would implement the recommendations in letter and spirit.
Only Chennai had implemented Cas in full and the other three metros had only implemented this in pockets. Noting that it was clear that the DTH system was the most popular form of an addressable system, there cannot be any doubt or dispute that the vices attached to the non-addressable system can be eliminated provided the addressable system is put in place completely. The Tribunal, therefore, welcomed the move by Trai to set goals. Noting that the Supreme Court had asked Trai to proceed to carry out its exercise without in any way being influenced by the observations made by this Tribunal or the High Courts, the Tribunal said "Trai unfortunately, did not do so and proceeded on the basis of the observations made by this Tribunal." It opined that making of a tariff order would be imperative in view of the order of the High Court.
According to the broadcasters, the advertisement revenue payable to the DTH operators would be more than Rs 88 billion. Pay channel broadcasters pay only Rs 2.85 billion as carriage/placement.The tribunal said by the Tariff Order, two unequals were being treated equally. In the case of analogue under declaration is rampant; in another, it is nil. In one case, it is difficult to find out the acted viewership; in another it is not so. In one viewers have no choice or limited choice but in another the viewers can exercise their choices to the fullest extent. The tribunal also accepted the view that sports channels are a class by themselves and the difficulties faced by them have not been adequately addressed. The cost components of a sports channel cannot be compared with the general entertainment channels. Moreover, the cost of procuring content has been increasing over the years. It, therefore, said "it is no ground to contend that the sportscasters are aware of the tariff and, thus, they should mould their business model which should address that situation."
Content - Indiantelevision
This rate had been fixed in the proviso to Clause Four of the Telecommunication (Broadcasting & Cable) Services (Fourth) (Addressable System Order) 2010 issued on 21 July which came into effect from 1 September this year. Earlier, broadcasters charged from DTH and IPTV players 50 per cent of what they got from cable operators. Tdsat chairperson SB Sinha and members GD Gaiha and PK Rastogi in their order said Trai should start the process of tariff fixation upon taking the relevant factors into consideration afresh and should for the purpose of laying down tariffs undertake a detailed study of the same. The order came on appeals by ESPN, Zee Turner, Star Den, MSM Discovery, Sun TV Network, Viacom18, Ushodaya Enterprises of Hyderabad, and Neo Sports against the Trai Tariff Order. Some of the DTH operators with DTH Operators Association of India as also other MSOs have been impleaded as parties, as also the Tamil Nadu Progressive Consumer Centre.
On 23 August, broadcasters had moved Tdsat challenging Trai's tariff order to cap wholesale price of channels to service providers like DTH and IPTV. The broadcasters had submitted that while fixing the tariff, Trai had acted in an arbitrary and unreasonable manner and did not consider the suggestions of the stakeholders. At the outset, the Tdsat bench admitted it had not been able to deliver judgement for several reasons. "One of these being long arguments and a clarification sought for subsequently by us with regard to inter alia, the applicability of Section 11(1)(b)(iv) vis-a-vis Section 11(2) of the Trai Act and also due to non-filing of Written Statements by some of the counsel in time," it said.
Noting that it had been accepted by every stakeholder that almost all the problems would be solved if "addressability' is achieved, the tribunal said it failed to 'understand why the Government has not taken adequate measure in this behalf. Even in the capital town of Delhi, it has not been fully achieved." The Tribunal expressed the hope that the target fixed by Trai will receive adequate attention of the Government and it would implement the recommendations in letter and spirit.
Only Chennai had implemented Cas in full and the other three metros had only implemented this in pockets. Noting that it was clear that the DTH system was the most popular form of an addressable system, there cannot be any doubt or dispute that the vices attached to the non-addressable system can be eliminated provided the addressable system is put in place completely. The Tribunal, therefore, welcomed the move by Trai to set goals. Noting that the Supreme Court had asked Trai to proceed to carry out its exercise without in any way being influenced by the observations made by this Tribunal or the High Courts, the Tribunal said "Trai unfortunately, did not do so and proceeded on the basis of the observations made by this Tribunal." It opined that making of a tariff order would be imperative in view of the order of the High Court.
According to the broadcasters, the advertisement revenue payable to the DTH operators would be more than Rs 88 billion. Pay channel broadcasters pay only Rs 2.85 billion as carriage/placement.The tribunal said by the Tariff Order, two unequals were being treated equally. In the case of analogue under declaration is rampant; in another, it is nil. In one case, it is difficult to find out the acted viewership; in another it is not so. In one viewers have no choice or limited choice but in another the viewers can exercise their choices to the fullest extent. The tribunal also accepted the view that sports channels are a class by themselves and the difficulties faced by them have not been adequately addressed. The cost components of a sports channel cannot be compared with the general entertainment channels. Moreover, the cost of procuring content has been increasing over the years. It, therefore, said "it is no ground to contend that the sportscasters are aware of the tariff and, thus, they should mould their business model which should address that situation."
Content - Indiantelevision
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
